Awesome, must have missed that. Thanks Stefano!
Best Regards, Patrick McGarry Director, Community || Inktank http://ceph.com || http://inktank.com @scuttlemonkey || @ceph || @inktank On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org>wrote: > On Fri 12 Jul 2013 06:53:46 AM PDT, Patrick McGarry wrote: > > In fact, we'd love to see a similar abstracted approach on the object > > storage side as well. > > Indeed, there is some work already going in this direction for OpenStack > Object Storage. A couple of Red Hat engineers are working on LFS, Local > File System (https://github.com/zaitcev/swift-lfs and > http://zaitcev.livejournal.com/215159.html, plus there is something in > review on review.openstack.org, too) to allow swift to better integrate > with different filesystems. > > Something like LFS was originally proposed by Nexenta a while back but > their patch unfortunately never merged. > > LFS was mentioned on swiftstack blog after the summit in Portland. > details on > > http://swiftstack.com/blog/2013/04/24/openstack-summit-api-discussion/ > > HTH > stef > > -- > Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
