On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Community Manager here - just confirming - "OpenStack" has not "chosen > Ceph". Not sure where that information is coming from - got a blog link so > we can fix any confusion? :) > > > Regards, > > Tom > > > On 12/07/13 10:23, Zippy Zeppoli wrote: > >> Hello, >> I apologize if this email causes some kind of subjective ruckus, but >> frankly I don't care (sorry etiquette) since it will resolve a >> reasonable question that isn't clearly answered on the web. >> >> Why did openstack choose ceph and not glusterfs. There doesn't seem to >> be a lot of (good) information on how/why to choose one over the other, >> and I'm sure most folks do a proof-of-concept to figure this out, but it >> doesn't seem like a lot of information has been shared on the matter. >> >> That being said, OpenStack is a large open source project that has >> decided to use this storage platform (big decision). Why and how did the >> technical architects for OpenStack come to this decision (blog post >> would be awesome, wasn't able to find one Googling). >> >> CheerZ >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~**openstack<https://launchpad.net/~openstack> > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~**openstack<https://launchpad.net/~openstack> > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> > Hi Zippy, To be clear, OpenStack doesn't really "choose" at all. In terms of Cinder you have a choice, that could be the base LVM implementation, Ceph-RBD, Gluster or any choice from a long list of supported/integrated backend storage devices. John
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
