Hi Jim, Thank you! I'll check libvirt in more detail to make sure nothing I need is missing. With xend it should work. I'm planning ahead and want to deploy on Libxl but for the sake of argument I will probably use both KVM (Daniel is to blame here :) ) and Xen with libxl while I test out everything. It's a good thing to see interest in libvirt. For some reason I though that libvirt will move slower with new features (granted libxl has changed from 4.1 to 4.2). Also being bugged by this: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtAPI I also plan on local storage (will have to code that since I need performance and stability) so migration will not be used much (offline maybe and this should work I believe). Other than that I wish for a cow, like ZFS's zvol, maybe in 10 years or so.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Jim Fehlig <jfeh...@suse.com> wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Cristian Tomoiaga wrote: > > > >> As for the compute part, I may need to work with libvirt but I want to > >> avoid that if possible. Libxl was meant for stacks right ? Again, this > may > >> not be acceptable and I would like to know. > >> > > > > Nova already has two drivers which support Xen, one using XenAPI and > > the other using libvirt. Libvirt itself will either use the legacy > > XenD/XenStore APIs, or on new enough Xen will use libxl. > > > > libxl is a pretty low level interface, not really targetted for direct > > application usage, but rather for building management APIs like libvirt > > or XCP. IMHO it would not really be appropriate for OpenStack to directly > > use libxl. Given that Nova already has two virt drivers which can work > > with Xen, I also don't really think there's a need to add a 3rd using > > libxl. > > > > Absolutely agreed, we do not want a libxl nova virt driver :). > > FYI, I have not tried the libvirt libxl driver on Xen compute nodes - > all of my nodes are running the legacy xend toolstack and thus using the > legacy libvirt xen driver. (I plan to switch these nodes to the new > toolstack in the Xen 4.3 timeframe.) That said, the libxl driver should > work on a Xen compute node running the libxl stack. I still haven't > finished the migration patch for the libvirt libxl driver, so migration > between "libxl" Xen compute nodes is not possible. > > Regards, > Jim > > -- Regards, Cristian Tomoiaga
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp