On Jun 21, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > <snip> > > * Run BugTriage days more often ? > We could have regular (monthly?) Nova Bugtriage days to get rid of what > accumulated in the mean time. But I fear that urgent bugs might not get > the attention they deserve, and that over time less and less people > participate to those exciting events...
+1 > > * Add BugTriaging to the core dev duties (new ReviewDays task) ? > May be a good idea since core devs are also Nova bug supervisors, so > they actually /can/ triage bugs. However it sounds a bit unfair to core > devs, and I fear it would result in Nova reviews getting even less > attention than they get currently... Lets hold off on this until we see how the below goes > > * Should we just encourage more people to do BugTriaging ? > Sounds like the obvious solution. However to do good triaging, you need > bug supervisors rights, and when I proposed to open that team (the > nova-bugs team) to anyone, there was resistance. Maybe it makes sense > for Nova though... or maybe someone should actively manage that team and > grant rights to any known triager that needs them. Lets just open it up for now and approve everyone in the current queue > > Thoughts ? Other suggestions ? A formalized way for triagers to mark tough bugs for review by core would be great. Then a core duty of sifting through those bugs makes sense. Vish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
