Errata corrige for point b) a pool of developers (not necessarily the first committer) DOES NOT keep the code up to date, AND DOES NOT increase functionality and test coverage (both unit and functional);
:) > -----Original Message----- > From: openstack-bounces+armando.migliaccio=eu.citrix....@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:openstack- > bounces+armando.migliaccio=eu.citrix....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of > Armando Migliaccio > Sent: 02 February 2012 11:52 > To: Thierry Carrez; openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Essex dead wood cutting > > To the best of my knowledge, the ESXi support is up to date. There may be > bugs, but which virt driver is perfect ;)? > > Sateesh may know more, because he is the main contributor/maintainer from > Citrix. > > However, as Vish pointed out in a previous email, any driver is doomed to rot > if: > > a) no one is deploying OpenStack using the specific driver, thus unveiling > potential problems; > b) a pool of developers (not necessarily the first committer) keep the code up > to date, increase functionality and test coverage (both unit and functional); > > Clearly both xenapi and libvirt are actively developed and deployed. How about > vmwareapi? Anyone? > > Let's make sure that vmwareapi is not going to be the next one to bite the > dust. > > A. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: openstack-bounces+armando.migliaccio=eu.citrix....@lists.launchpad.net > > [mailto:openstack- > > bounces+armando.migliaccio=eu.citrix....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of > > Thierry Carrez > > Sent: 02 February 2012 08:53 > > To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net > > Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Essex dead wood cutting > > > > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > Just as Nova enters feature freeze, it sounds like a good moment to > > > consider removing deprecated, known-buggy-and-unmaintained or useless > > > feature code from the Essex tree. > > > > > > Here are my suggestions for removal: > > > > > > - Ajaxterm (unmaintained, security issues, replaced by VNC console) > > > - Hyper-V support (known broken and unmaintained) > > > > While we are at it (and since I'm getting used to press coverage), > > what's the state of the "VMWareAPI" support ? > > > > I knew Hyper-V was not working because bugs were reported against it... > > but I don't really know how functional vmwareapi actually is. > > > > -- > > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > Release Manager, OpenStack > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
