On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 10:10 -0800, Lloyd Dewolf wrote: >> Where do I find this previous discussion? > > around here: > https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg02169.html > > What do you think of the requirements we're gathering for the Q&A > system? I'd like your opinion on that as we move on.
Thanks Stefano. I really like everyone reframing the discussion to figure out what our needs are as opposed to ... shiny! I do think stackexchange (SE) is miles [1] ahead and the only system that will meet the majority of our requirements. If we can get our own Area51 then it's by far the best immediate solution. I spoke to a friend at Area51, and he suggested we might have different results if we tried again. So I feel like this is on the table if we want to pursue. Of course, having very active SE participants (high reputation) put the proposal forward and committing to it carries a lot of weight. My reputation [2] is weak today, but I'm sure myself and others could ramp up the levels quickly over the next few months. Cheers, Lloyd -- 1. See I'm getting used to United States customary units, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customary_units 2. http://stackexchange.com/users/25765?tab=accounts _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
