On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:10:00AM -0700, David Medberry wrote: :Jon, : :I think the Foundation staff were very very wary of extending the PTG or :doing dual sites simultaneously due to not saving a thing logistically. :Yes, it would conceivably save travel for folks that need to go to two :separate events (as would the other colo options on the table) but not :saving a thing logistically over two separate events as we have now. A six :or seven day sprint/thing/ptg would also mean encroaching on one or both :weekends (above and beyond travel dates) and that may really limit venue :choices as private parties (weddings, etc) tend to book those locales on :weekends.
Yes, that was my main concern as well. Though I'd not extended it to the fact the two events wouldn't fit in a single working week. So sounds like the logistics are just illogistical. -Jon :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: : :> :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com> :> wrote: :> :> :> The big topic of debate, however, was whether subsequent meetups should :> be :> :> co-located with OpenStack PTG. This is a question for the wider :> OpenStack :> :> operators community. :> :> For people who attend both I thnik this would be a big win, if they :> were in the same location (city anyway) but held in series. One :> (longer) trip but no scheduling conflict. :> :> Downside I see is that makes scheduling constraints pretty tight :> either for having two sponsorslocation available in a coordinated time :> and place or making a much bigger ask of a single location. :> :> Those are my thoughts, not sure if the amount to an opinion. :> :> -Jon :> :> :> -- _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators