Jon, I think the Foundation staff were very very wary of extending the PTG or doing dual sites simultaneously due to not saving a thing logistically. Yes, it would conceivably save travel for folks that need to go to two separate events (as would the other colo options on the table) but not saving a thing logistically over two separate events as we have now. A six or seven day sprint/thing/ptg would also mean encroaching on one or both weekends (above and beyond travel dates) and that may really limit venue choices as private parties (weddings, etc) tend to book those locales on weekends.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Proulx <j...@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Chris Morgan <mihali...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > :> The big topic of debate, however, was whether subsequent meetups should > be > :> co-located with OpenStack PTG. This is a question for the wider > OpenStack > :> operators community. > > For people who attend both I thnik this would be a big win, if they > were in the same location (city anyway) but held in series. One > (longer) trip but no scheduling conflict. > > Downside I see is that makes scheduling constraints pretty tight > either for having two sponsorslocation available in a coordinated time > and place or making a much bigger ask of a single location. > > Those are my thoughts, not sure if the amount to an opinion. > > -Jon > > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
