On 7/31/16, 7:13 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 07/29/2016 11:35 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because >> it requires a member user. We have a few approaches to fixing this >> problem in mind, but want to understand what Operators want. Devstack >> itself has switched between member and _member_ although Devstack isn't >> our reference: Operators are. >> >> Which of those do operators prefer (if either). >> >> Another question was whether we should create a default user named >> "user" and use this in place of member. > >"member" is a role, not a user. The default unprivileged user is named >"demo" and has the "member" role in a project called "demo". Yup, thanks for the correction. > >Are you asking what the name of the unprivileged *role* should be by >default in Kolla installations? Or are you asking what, if any, a >default unprivileged *user* should be called? The idea of adding a user called "user" with a role called "user" was proposed. Curious if operators care to want that. Regards -steve > >Best, >-jay > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-operators mailing list >OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
