> On Apr 7, 2016, at 9:23 PM, Edgar Magana <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I do agree that PWG should be the place for collecting product features > requirements and properly delivered to the project teams. I am not sure how > to use OSOps for User Stories, any example of that? The Enterprise WG and Telco WG are already submitting their user stories into the Product WG and we would be glad to welcome user stories from the Ops community as well!
One way to use OSOps might be to copy the template[1] from the product working group and collaborate with other operators to refine the user story, however I would still encourage eventual submission to the product working group repository. This would help us ensure that user stories from multiple sources are available in a common area. If you would like to learn more about the Product Working Group then the birds of a feather session[2] at the summit will be a great one to join! I echo what Kenny said, we would love user stories from OpenStack operators! [1] https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories/blob/master/user-story-template.rst [2] https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9041 > > Edgar > > From: Joseph Bajin <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 5:50 AM > To: Kenny Johnston <[email protected]> > Cc: OpenStack Operators <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [osops] Finding ways to get operator > issues to projects - Starting with NOVA > > This is great Kenny! > > I will see about attending one of the PWG sessions in the next few weeks. > > What I was thinking and maybe this works or doesn't was to have the "OSOps" > group be that central point where Operators could feed User Stories. I was > thinking that this may make it easier for groups to see all the Operators > requests, User Stories, complaints, appreciations, etc in one central > location. That way if someone didn't know that there was say Product Work > Group, they at least could get their story down for others to see. > > > >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Kenny Johnston <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I'll throw this out there but the Product Work Group[1] has a place for >> submitting "User Stories"[2] which are meant to be robust descriptions of >> problem statements and use cases. Speaking as a core PWG team member, I can >> say we'd love to have operators submit User Stories with whatever level of >> detail they have available so our Product Team can help iterate and flesh >> out the stories for consideration by project teams. >> >> You can find the PWG team in #openstack-product or in the PWG Mailling >> list[3] >> >> [1]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam >> [2]https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories >> [3]http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg >> >>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Joseph Bajin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Christoph, >>> >>> This is a great idea and a tool I think others would be very interested in >>> having. >>> >>> Now the question that I have to you and everyone else, is within the >>> Operators community how would we capture this information so we could open >>> up dialogue with both the Neutron and Nova teams? >>> >>> --Joe >>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Andreas Torlinsky >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Joseph, we would propose a migration tool for getting the NOVA >>>> networking database information into mapping it Neutron, >>>> as we are seeing an increasing demand to "upgrade" from Nova Networking to >>>> an OpenStack Neutron and SDN 3rd Party based >>>> model for Cloud Computing amongst our installed base of OpenStack >>>> customers, some of whom grew out of Nova networking and it's >>>> limits in leveraging VLANs. >>>> >>>> I also caught sight of the recent write ups here , which seem to point in >>>> the same direction actually, in lieu of adoption of Liberty from >>>> older release: >>>> >>>> http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/networking-guide/migration-nova-network-to-neutron.html >>>> >>>> Any tooling to make this easier as a migration process, we (me) are keen >>>> to engage and help, >>>> >>>> Let us know if anyone else is on the same level working on things, >>>> >>>> c >>>> >>>> >>>> Christoph Andreas Torlinski >>>> +44(0)7872413856 UK Mobile >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> On 26 March 2016 at 20:47, Joseph Bajin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Operators, >>>>> >>>>> At the last OSOps Tools and Monitoring meeting, we had mriedem (Nova >>>>> Team) talk with us about a proposal that they are working on. The Nova >>>>> team would like to abandon the use of a wish-list as it has grown to an >>>>> unmanageable size. They have posted a few times to both the operators >>>>> list [1] as well as the developers list [2] about their idea. They would >>>>> like to work with us operators to find the best way to get our ideas into >>>>> their prioritization list. At the mid-cycle and summit meet-ups, we >>>>> continue to create etherpads [3] that make mention to the troubles we >>>>> have, as well as the work we have done to overcome them. These are >>>>> examples of the work that the NOVA team would like to hear about. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to gather some ideas and thoughts from the operator community on >>>>> not only the NOVA proposal but ways that we could get the feedback we >>>>> create each cycle to each of the respective projects. One idea that I >>>>> have is using the OSOps repo as a way for us to gather and track these >>>>> wishlist type of items. Then the OSOps working group could be used to >>>>> help try get these worked on. >>>>> >>>>> I'd love to get help and hear ideas from others about how we could >>>>> improve and build on this process. Please let me know your thoughts. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-March/009942.html >>>>> [2] >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/089365.html >>>>> [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operator-local-patches >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >> >> -- >> Kenny Johnston | irc:kencjohnston | @kencjohnston > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
