Just sending this out to the Operator Community for more feedback. We'll be having a session at the summit about it, but I'd like to get this discussion going a little more here if we could.
--Joe On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Joseph Bajin <[email protected]> wrote: > Operators, > > At the last OSOps Tools and Monitoring meeting, we had mriedem (Nova Team) > talk with us about a proposal that they are working on. The Nova team would > like to abandon the use of a wish-list as it has grown to an unmanageable > size. They have posted a few times to both the operators list [1] as well > as the developers list [2] about their idea. They would like to work with > us operators to find the best way to get our ideas into their > prioritization list. At the mid-cycle and summit meet-ups, we continue to > create etherpads [3] that make mention to the troubles we have, as well as > the work we have done to overcome them. These are examples of the work that > the NOVA team would like to hear about. > > I'd like to gather some ideas and thoughts from the operator community on > not only the NOVA proposal but ways that we could get the feedback we > create each cycle to each of the respective projects. One idea that I have > is using the OSOps repo as a way for us to gather and track these wishlist > type of items. Then the OSOps working group could be used to help try get > these worked on. > > I'd love to get help and hear ideas from others about how we could improve > and build on this process. Please let me know your thoughts. > > Thanks > > Joe > > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-March/009942.html > [2] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/089365.html > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operator-local-patches > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
