+1 would be great to have some more people involved in this.

On 23/03/16 13:30, Shamail Tahir wrote:
Hi,

We could definitely use more attendance/help on the ops-tag team... The
data in project navigator comes from multiple sources but the install
guide availability[1], packages[2], etc. are derived from ops-tags[3].
The team meets once a month (3rd Thursday of every month) to review open
tags.  I agree with Tim that we should determine how we can automate the
information collection as much as possible... It's not abandoned but
more participation would be helpful.  We are nearing the point where we
should start populating tags for Mitaka.

[1]
https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-docs-install-guide.json
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/blob/master/liberty/ops-packaged.json
[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Tags

Thanks,
Shamail


On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Hauke Bruno Wollentin
<hauke-bruno.wollen...@innovo-cloud.de
<mailto:hauke-bruno.wollen...@innovo-cloud.de>> wrote:

    fullack with both of you. The project guide itself is an awesome
    idea but don't know why, it looks a bit abandoned for now. Would be
    great if someone - maybe from the cross project team(?) - could
    point out how we all could make things better (or even who the right
    person to talk to is ;)).

    just my 2 cents,
    cheers,
    hauke


    *From:* Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com <mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com>>
    *Sent:* Mar 23, 2016 11:00 AM
    *To:* Tim Bell
    *Cc:* openstack-operators
    *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [tags] Appealing for change of tags

    The projects themselves don't seems updated, there are other
    projects in the big-tent that are not
    listed there yet.

    On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch
    <mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> wrote:


        Looking at projects like Barbican in the
        https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican,
        they seem to have met some conditions which are currently marked
        as ‘no’.

        What is the mechanism to query these settings (either manual or
        automatic) ?

        As an example, there is significant documentation for Barbican
        at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/ but it is
        marked as ‘no’ in the page for
        https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican
        Is there an install guide for this project guide (at
        docs.openstack.org <http://docs.openstack.org>)?

        How about adding

          * some algorithmic description (i.e. automatic or manual) for
            the selection ? If automatic, the algorithm could be
            provided so the project knows what to do
          * a process description for the manual cases for projects to
            ask for a re-classification

        Tim


        _______________________________________________
        OpenStack-operators mailing list
        OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
        <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




    --
    Best Regards ,

    The G.

    _______________________________________________
    OpenStack-operators mailing list
    OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
    <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to