fullack with both of you. The project guide itself is an awesome idea but don't 
know why, it looks a bit abandoned for now. Would be great if someone - maybe 
from the cross project team(?) - could point out how we all could make things 
better (or even who the right person to talk to is ;)).

just my 2 cents,
cheers,
hauke


From: Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com>
Sent: Mar 23, 2016 11:00 AM
To: Tim Bell
Cc: openstack-operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [tags] Appealing for change of tags

The projects themselves don't seems updated, there are other projects in the 
big-tent that are not
listed there yet.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tim Bell 
<tim.b...@cern.ch<mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> wrote:

Looking at projects like Barbican in the 
https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican, they 
seem to have met some conditions which are currently marked as 'no'.

What is the mechanism to query these settings (either manual or automatic) ?

As an example, there is significant documentation for Barbican at  
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/ but it is marked as 'no' in the 
page for 
https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican  Is 
there an install guide for this project guide (at 
docs.openstack.org<http://docs.openstack.org>)?

How about adding

  *   some algorithmic description (i.e. automatic or manual) for the selection 
? If automatic, the algorithm could be provided so the project knows what to do
  *   a process description for the manual cases for projects to ask for a 
re-classification

Tim


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators




--
Best Regards ,

The G.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to