Hi Adam, We provide various volume types which differ in
- performance (implemented via different IOPS QoS specifications, not via different hardware), - service quality (e.g. volumes on a Ceph pool that is on Diesel-backed servers, so via separate hardware), - a combination of the two, - geographical location (with a second Ceph instance in another data centre). I think it is absolutely realistic/manageable to use the same Ceph cluster for various use cases. HTH, Arne > On 26 Oct 2015, at 14:02, Adam Lawson <alaw...@aqorn.com> wrote: > > Has anyone deployed Ceph and accommodate different disk/performance > requirements? I.e. Saving ephemeral storage and boot volumes on SSD and less > important content such as object storage, glance images on SATA or something > along those lines? > > Just looking at it's realistic (or discover best practice) on using the same > Ceph cluster for both use cases... > > //adam > > Adam Lawson > > AQORN, Inc. > 427 North Tatnall Street > Ste. 58461 > Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230 > Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101 > International: +1 302-387-4660 > Direct: +1 916-246-2072 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
