Adam, We use different pools for volumes, images, and Nova ephemeral disks with our Openstack+Ceph deployment. We don’t currently use different disk types, but there is no reason we couldn’t - and we do plan to do so in the future.
We also leverage a non-Ceph SSD solution that we already own for SSD-backed Cinder volumes in addition to our Ceph based Cinder volumes since Cinder lets you have multi-backend. Mike Smith Principal Engineer / Cloud Team Lead Overstock.com<http://Overstock.com> On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Adam Lawson <alaw...@aqorn.com<mailto:alaw...@aqorn.com>> wrote: Has anyone deployed Ceph and accommodate different disk/performance requirements? I.e. Saving ephemeral storage and boot volumes on SSD and less important content such as object storage, glance images on SATA or something along those lines? Just looking at it's realistic (or discover best practice) on using the same Ceph cluster for both use cases... //adam Adam Lawson AQORN, Inc. 427 North Tatnall Street Ste. 58461 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230 Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101 International: +1 302-387-4660 Direct: +1 916-246-2072 [http://www.aqorn.com/images/logo.png] _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
