I was afraid of that. We’ve got 90 minutes for the breakout sessions - can we treat Large Scale and Public as a single session, and divide it 45-45 or 60-30?
Geoff > On Aug 6, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Part of the LDT is discussing networking issues with Neutron folks that will > not be in the room, so moving it would require re-synchronizing schedules. > I'd rather avoid that if possible... > > Ryan Moats > > Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com> wrote on 08/06/2015 12:37:49 PM: > > > From: Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com> > > To: Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org>, mord...@inaugust.com > > Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > Date: 08/06/2015 12:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup > > (August 18, 19) > > > > Well, I’d prefer not to put Public Clouds into the existing HPC > > slot, because I’m involved in the Product WG discussion that’s > > scheduled at the same time. > > > > Could we put Public Clouds in the Tuesday breakout mix, and Large > > Deployments in the Wednesday breakout (replacing the HPC WG). > > > > Geoff > > > > PS Will you be there, Monty? Any preferences? > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Geoff. > > > > > > Which session would you propose to replace? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote: > > >> I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with > > >> public cloud operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.) > > >> As Stefano pointed out yesterday: > > >> > > >> http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/ > > >> <http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/> > > >> > > >> this is an area which probably needs more attention. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Geoff > > >> > > >>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org > > >>> <mailto:t...@openstack.org <mailto:t...@openstack.org>>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I've received feedback that maybe there won't be enough HPC folks in > > >>> Palo Alto to run a 90 minute working session on it :) > > >>> > > >>> I would propose to slot in instead one of these three, which are > > >>> currently not well included on the agenda: > > >>> > > >>> 1)apps.openstack.org <http://apps.openstack.org/ > > >>> <http://apps.openstack.org/>>-What the Ops > > >>> Community would like from it, should we look from the Application > > >>> side, ie Applications that can run on your cloud, or Augment your > > >>> cloud, Products that can help enhance your cloud. > > >>> > > >>> 2) Openstack Personas (validation) - The UX team will have a set of > > >>> roles that we would like to validate with the opertator community. > > >>> > > >>> 3) Task Taxonomy - The UX team is creating an inventory of > > >>> "standardized" tasks that can be used to create scenarios and create a > > >>> common vernacular within the community. > > >>> > > >>> Any thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Tom > > >>> > > >>> On 03/08/15 18:48, Tom Fifield wrote: > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo Alto. If you're > > >>>> on the fence, hopefully this discussion will get you quickly over the > > >>>> line so you don't miss out! > > >>>> > > >>>> http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup- > > >>>> <http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-> > > tickets-17703258924 > > >>>> > > >>>> So, I've taken our suggestions and attempted to wrangle them into > > >>>> something that would fit in the space we have over 2 days. > > >>>> > > >>>> As a reminder, we have two different kind of sessions - General > > >>>> Sessions, whichare discussions for the operator community aimed to > > >>>> produce actions (eg best practices, feedback on badness), > > >>>> and**Working groups**focus on specific topicsaiming to make concrete > > >>>> progress on tasks in that area. > > >>>> > > >>>> As always, some stuff has been munged and mangled in an attempt to > > >>>> fit it in. For example, we'd expect to talk about Kolla more > > >>>> generally in the context of "Using Containers for Deployment", > > >>>> because there are some other ways to do that too. Similarly, we'd > > >>>> expect the "ops project" discussion to be rolled into the session on > > >>>> the user committee. > > >>>> > > >>>> Anyway, take a look at the below and reply with your comments! Is > > >>>> anything missing? Something look like a terrible idea? Want to > > >>>> completely change the room layout? There's still a little bit of > > >>>> flexibility at this stage. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Tuesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus > > >>>> 9:00 - 10:00 Registration > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 10:00 - 10:30 Introduction > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 10:30 - 11:15 Burning Issues > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 11:15 - 11:55 Hypervisor Tuning > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 11:55 - 12:05 Breakout Explain > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 12:05 - 13:30 Lunch > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 13:30 - 15:00 Large Deployments Team Burning Issues Logging WG > > >>>> Upgrades WG Ops Guide Fixing > > >>>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 16:00 - 17:00 Using Containers for Deployment > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 17:00 - 18:00 Lightening Talks > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Wednesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus > > >>>> 9:00 - 09:45 CMDB: use cases > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 9:45 - 10:30 Deployment Tips - read only slaves? admin-only > > API servers? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 10:30 - 11:15 What network model are you using? Are you happy? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 11:15 - 11:30 Coffee > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 11:30 - 12:15 User Committee Discussion > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 12:15 - 12:20 Breakout Explain > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 12:20 - 13:30 Lunch > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 13:30 - 15:00 Tools and Monitoring Product WG Packaging > > HPC Working > > >>>> Group Ops Tags Team > > >>>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 16:00 - 17:00 Feedback Session, Tokyo Planning > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> There will be a followup email shortly regarding moderators for the > > >>>> sessions - thanks to those who volunteered so far! > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Tom > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list > > >>>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > >>>> > > >>>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list > > >>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > >>> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > >>> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>> > > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > >>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-operators mailing list > > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
