On 06/01/15 12:22, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 01/06/15 17:18, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
On 06/01/15 11:07, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
Thank you very much for officially kicking off the Ops Tags Team at the
Vancouver summit!
Based on our discussions, I've made a bit of progress. We now have a
* wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Tags
* repository: https://github.com/stackforge/ops-tags-team
... and ... a first attempt at writing up those tags we discussed at the
meeting:
* Ops:docs:install-guide: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186638/
* Ops:Packaged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186633/
Please jump on the code review system and add your comments!
Regards,
Tom
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Thanks Tom! Great start. I have already added some of my comments to the
reviews.
Does this repo have the same 'core' reviewer methodology like all others?
If so who are those who have the 'authority' to merge patch?
A very good question!
At the moment it's me+user committee (Tim Bell, Subbu Allamaraju, Jon
Proulx).
What should it be? What do we aim for, going forward?
At the moment that should suffice - but as we started to discuss at the
summit - there should be a mechanism (which should should follow the the
OpenStack standards and by-laws) of how additional people can be
added/removed from the list of 'all-mighty-powered-ones'.
This should probably be on the agenda for our first meeting on IRC
(which was supposed to be when exactly?)
--
Best Regards,
Maish Saidel-Keesing
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
