Thanks Jesse, But about sheepdog, I saw a presenation of sheepdog and openstack integration. In this presentation, it is claimed that sheepdog is unified storage backend for swift, cinder and glance. Check the attachment. See: https://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-videos/presentation/sheepdog-yet-another-all-in-one-storage-for-openstack Presentation Title: Yet Another All-In-One Storage for Openstack
On 11/7/14, Jesse Pretorius <jesse.pretor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 November 2014 13:01, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference >> between them... >> - Which one is better support in openstack? >> - Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack >> storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)? >> > > I don't think that Gluster or Sheepdog provide a storage back-end capable > of providing block storage (cinder) and object storage (swift) back-ends. > Only Ceph provides a properly unified back-end for both. Ceph has also been > supported for cinder for over two years - it's very mature. The Rados > Gateway (Object Storage/Swift Interface) is much more recent, but I have > yet to see problems with it - as long as you do acknowledge that it is not > Swift. >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
