I personally find Ceph to be the most mature project and more easily scalable. El 06/11/2014 13:40, "Hossein Zabolzadeh" <zabolza...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Hello there, > I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or > GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each project > itself, but want to know what is the real difference between them when > used as glance, swift and cinder storage backend? > Any help appreciated. > Thanks in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
