On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On 07/02/2014 06:37 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 07/02/2014 12:25 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >>>> I'd like to look at this in terms of the end goal, translations. That is >>>> the end goal, yes? >>>> >>>> Is one tool any better than the other (zanta and pootle are the two >>>> options, yes?) at doing translating? Is the end product substantially >>>> better using one tool than the other? >>> >>> Right, Zanata and Pootle are the two leading options. The translations >>> team seemed to prefer Zanata so we said we'd work to get a demo going >>> for them so they could try it themselves, just like we have for >>> Pootle. >>> >>> On our end maintainability is the major consideration, since we don't >>> want to deploy a solution that will be disruptive to translators >>> (during upgrades, etc) or insecure. >>> >> Can we get an item on next week's infra agenda and have some of the >> folks doing the translation work attend and offer their opinion? >> >> It seems we might be at a point of weighing costs of setup and >> maintenance time versus advantages of use. > > The i18n team meets tomorrow at 8am UTC - Liz, if you're awake, you > could also join there...
Thanks! As tends to be the case with i18n meetings, that's 1AM for me, but I'll see what I can do :) -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 http://www.princessleia.com _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
