On 07/02/2014 06:37 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 12:25 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote:
>>> I'd like to look at this in terms of the end goal, translations. That is
>>> the end goal, yes?
>>>
>>> Is one tool any better than the other (zanta and pootle are the two
>>> options, yes?) at doing translating? Is the end product substantially
>>> better using one tool than the other?
>>
>> Right, Zanata and Pootle are the two leading options. The translations
>> team seemed to prefer Zanata so we said we'd work to get a demo going
>> for them so they could try it themselves, just like we have for
>> Pootle.
>>
>> On our end maintainability is the major consideration, since we don't
>> want to deploy a solution that will be disruptive to translators
>> (during upgrades, etc) or insecure.
>>
> Can we get an item on next week's infra agenda and have some of the
> folks doing the translation work attend and offer their opinion?
>
> It seems we might be at a point of weighing costs of setup and
> maintenance time versus advantages of use.
The i18n team meets tomorrow at 8am UTC - Liz, if you're awake, you
could also join there...
Liz, thanks a lot for looking into this!
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
