On 31/01/17 08:34 AM, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > If you query Vitrage (or get a notification from Vitrage) and then you query > Aodh, then Aodh will not return any additional information. But – if you > query only Aodh, you will be aware of the fact that the instances are at > risk. Without the integration, you will see that all instances are OK > performance-wise, and you might mistakenly conclude that everything is else > also fine.
i see. so the proposal was to have Aodh be the place where we collate alarms from Aodh AND Vitrage. i agree, that's probably not what Aodh should be doing (i'll still push that to Panko) would a possible workflow be to maybe have Vitrage send alert to Aodh and for Aodh to listen to that event and reraise if needed? or if vitrage can just reraise, then it can send that event to Panko so we can see all information on that resource. my assumption right now is Vitrage itself is listening for a bunch of alerts (from zabbix, etc...) and has a set of 'composite' alarms which when it receives alert x and alert y, it 'deduces' that it should send an alert z? cheers, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
