On 31/01/2017, 18:43, "gordon chung" <g...@live.ca> wrote: > On 31/01/17 08:34 AM, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL) wrote: > > If you query Vitrage (or get a notification from Vitrage) and then you > > query Aodh, then Aodh will not return any additional information. But – if > > you query only Aodh, you will be aware of the fact that the instances are > > at risk. Without the integration, you will see that all instances are OK > > performance-wise, and you might mistakenly conclude that everything is else > > also fine. > > > i see. so the proposal was to have Aodh be the place where we collate > alarms from Aodh AND Vitrage. i agree, that's probably not what Aodh > should be doing (i'll still push that to Panko) > > would a possible workflow be to maybe have Vitrage send alert to Aodh > and for Aodh to listen to that event and reraise if needed? or if > vitrage can just reraise, then it can send that event to Panko so we can > see all information on that resource.
I understand. So clearly the use case of Vitrage raising alarms in Aodh is not relevant at the moment. We will have to think if over and see how Panko fits in the use case. Thanks, Ifat. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
