Ian Cordasco wrote: > From: Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> >> On 16/01/17 21:55, Ian Cordasco wrote: >>> >>> Third, "Existence and quality of packages for this project in popular >>> distributions." it seems Fedora [2], Debian [3], Ubuntu [4], and >>> OpenSUSE [5] all have packages (including in stable versions). I can't >>> speak to the quality of the packages, but knowing the hard work most >>> of our downstream redistributors put into those packages, I'm certain >>> they're good quality. This should *definitely* be updated, in my >>> opinion. >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-org/+bug/1656843 >> >> https://github.com/OpenStackweb/openstack-org/pull/59 > > So, if I understand the two links correctly, changes are planned to > make that tag better and until they're made you're going to stop > displaying it using that with projects. Is that correct? Are there > other ways the community can help keep the navigator up-to-date?
Regarding stable branch policy and standard deprecation, this information is directly pulled from governance project tags. Both are assertion tags that the team must assert by themselves (by proposing a change to openstack/governance). Quick glance to: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/barbican.html shows that those tags haven't been asserted by the Barbican team yet. Reference: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/index.html -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
