On Mon, Jan 16 2017, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Related to the other thread I just started, I was looking at the > project navigator [1] for Barbican and found some things that look > wrong (to an outsider) and was hoping could be cleared up.
Don't worry, we (Telemetry) have already asked for that to be updated but nothing happened. I don't even recall that we had an answer about how the page is managed. See this thread from October 2016: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105617.html The page misses components for us also. I feel bad that the foundation Web site reflects bad data. It actually harms small projects that made good progress achieving better at what is called "maturity" being still wrongly noted 1/8. Sigh. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
