On 08/09/2016 08:25 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09 2016, John Dickinson wrote:
> 
>> I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every 
>> time
>> some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is propagated to
>> all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is maintaining 
>> packages
>> and dependencies in their own deployment. If one project needs a new feature
>> introduced in version 32, but another project claims compatibility with >=28,
>> that's ok. There's no need for the second project to raise the minimum 
>> version
>> when there isn't a conflict. (This is the position I advocated for at the
>> Austin summit.)
> 
> Amen to that.

+1


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to