On 08/09/2016 08:25 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09 2016, John Dickinson wrote: > >> I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every >> time >> some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is propagated to >> all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is maintaining >> packages >> and dependencies in their own deployment. If one project needs a new feature >> introduced in version 32, but another project claims compatibility with >=28, >> that's ok. There's no need for the second project to raise the minimum >> version >> when there isn't a conflict. (This is the position I advocated for at the >> Austin summit.) > > Amen to that.
+1 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev