On Tue, Aug 09 2016, John Dickinson wrote: > I'd like to advocate for *not* raising minimum versions very often. Every time > some OpenStack project raises minimum versions, this change is propagated to > all projects, and that puts extra burden on anyone who is maintaining packages > and dependencies in their own deployment. If one project needs a new feature > introduced in version 32, but another project claims compatibility with >=28, > that's ok. There's no need for the second project to raise the minimum version > when there isn't a conflict. (This is the position I advocated for at the > Austin summit.)
Amen to that. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
