Hi, I just fixed up Timofei's BP. I went through all the specs and spotted another 5 or 6 that were out of sync. There may well be others I didn't spot.
Thanks, johnthetubaguy On 14 June 2016 at 09:17, Timofei Durakov <tdura...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-compute-compute-communication > - bp is not approved, but the spec is. > > Timofey > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:47 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Matt, >> >> Thank you for the clarification. >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:07 AM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved >> spec but unapproved blueprint >> >> On 6/12/2016 7:48 PM, joehuang wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > This spec is not approved yet: >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/ >> > >> > But the BP is approved: >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-a >> > pi >> > >> > Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should >> > Nova support application level consistency snapshot for disaster recovery >> > purpose or not? >> > >> > Best Regards >> > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >> > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 9:08 PM >> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved >> > spec but unapproved blueprint >> > >> > I've come across several changes up for review that are tied to Newton >> > blueprints which have specs approved but the blueprints in launchpad are >> > not >> > yet approved. >> > >> > If you have a spec that was approved for Newton but your blueprint in >> > launchpad isn't approved yet, please ping me (mriedem) in IRC or reply to >> > this thread to get it approved and tracked for the Newton release. >> > It's important (at least to me) that we have an accurate representation >> > of how much work we're trying to get done this release, especially with >> > non-priority feature freeze coming up in three weeks. >> > >> >> Neither the spec nor the blueprint is approved. The blueprint was >> previously approved in mitaka but is not for newton, with reasons in the >> spec review for newton. >> >> At this point we're past non-priority spec approval freeze so this isn't >> going to get in for newton. There are a lot of concerns about this one so >> it's going to be tabled for at least this release, we can revisit in ocata, >> but it adds a lot of complexity and it's more than we're willing to take on >> right now given everything else planned for this release. >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt Riedemann >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
