Hi https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-compute-compute-communication - bp is not approved, but the spec is.
Timofey On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:47 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi, Matt, > > Thank you for the clarification. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:07 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved > spec but unapproved blueprint > > On 6/12/2016 7:48 PM, joehuang wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This spec is not approved yet: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/ > > > > But the BP is approved: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-a > > pi > > > > Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should > Nova support application level consistency snapshot for disaster recovery > purpose or not? > > > > Best Regards > > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 9:08 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Let me know if you have an approved > > spec but unapproved blueprint > > > > I've come across several changes up for review that are tied to Newton > blueprints which have specs approved but the blueprints in launchpad are > not yet approved. > > > > If you have a spec that was approved for Newton but your blueprint in > launchpad isn't approved yet, please ping me (mriedem) in IRC or reply to > this thread to get it approved and tracked for the Newton release. > > It's important (at least to me) that we have an accurate representation > of how much work we're trying to get done this release, especially with > non-priority feature freeze coming up in three weeks. > > > > Neither the spec nor the blueprint is approved. The blueprint was > previously approved in mitaka but is not for newton, with reasons in the > spec review for newton. > > At this point we're past non-priority spec approval freeze so this isn't > going to get in for newton. There are a lot of concerns about this one so > it's going to be tabled for at least this release, we can revisit in ocata, > but it adds a lot of complexity and it's more than we're willing to take on > right now given everything else planned for this release. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
