On 04/08/2016 03:19 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > On 04/08/2016 02:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: >> Are they using the numbers for some internal company purpose maybe? If so, >> how does it matter to any of us? >> >> Chasing this tail just takes time away from useful things, IMO. > > Although I understand the reasoning behind the effort underway in the review > above to skip Stackalytics stats for proposal bot reviews, it doesn't really > add a ton of value. As Doug noted, one cannot simply become a core reviewer > by gaming stackalytics. > > Those personal interactions on mailing lists, reviews with lots of patchsets, > IRC meetings, and in-person events (like mid-cycles/summits) make the big > difference. Can we reach out to some of these people making questionable > +1's and find out if we can help them become a more productive community > member? If there are companies out there who are setting "quotas" for review > counts, we could possibly reach out to them as well. Perhaps I'm being too > optimistic. :)
Nothing is stopping you from doing so. You can see the names and can find the emails of those engaged in this by following the gerrit link Dims posted in his first post. Perhaps as you say, the personal touch may help them to learn how to contribute in a way that has value. Thanks, Anita. > > But, as Dolph said earlier, leaving this issue alone certainly makes it > easier to single out the folks who are doing something unproductive. ;) > > -- > Major Hayden > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
