On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 06:28:14PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > The second issue is that we don't have any way to run an election on the > project, since we don't have a way to determine "contributors" (or rather, > the only voter and potential candidate under those rules would be Monty). > You can't even apply to be the PTL :) That is obviously an exceptional case > and if I read Tristan's answer correctly, it will naturally end up in the > process where the TC ends up picking the PTL. It feels natural if you're the > only candidate that we would pick you, but that will likely have to wait > until the end of the election period.
I don't think we have the luxury of waiting. There needs to be a small amount of corrective action taken now. As pointed out elsewhere in this thread the TC has the ability to appoint a PTL should a project end up leaderless should that happen. However, at the risk of sounding like a humorless automaton, we have a valid candidate. * Monty Taylor for Packaging-Deb PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292690/ In the interests of transparency I'll say this here. Monty if you do *NOT* have a genuine desire to lead the packaging-deb team please abandon that review ASAP. Also by the rules I feel like we have no choice but to reject * Adding Packaging-Deb/Thomas_Goirand.txt https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292885/ Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
