On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:45:14PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > The electorate rolls for project-teams without any > deliverables/repos end up being limited to the "extra-atc" entries > for them. For example, the I18N team has done an excellent job of > providing a curated list of active translators, rendered at: > > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/i18n.html#extra-atcs
Ah thank you for the clear and detailed reply. We'll update the election tooling to handle this case fro UX and I18N. > I guess for teams with no deliverables *and* no extra ATCs, they > probably also don't need a PTL? > > Packaging-Deb is the only one I see in an especially strange state > at the moment: it has one existing repo (the rest are phantoms which > were never created) with two Gerrit changes, both owned by the > team's sole code contributor (based on our traditional process of > enumerating Gerrit change owners)... Congratulations, Monty, on your > new de facto PTL-ship! :D Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
