> The tricky bit is that RDO does not include patches in our packages > built from trunk (trunk.rdoproject.org), and for liberty we first check > if stable/liberty exists, then fallback to master if it does not. So the > presence of stable/liberty that is not actually the recommended way to > build IPA for liberty is a bit not ideal for us.
Trunk builder will first use branch specified per project per release, and we can now override that easily in rdoinfo. > All of that said, I totally understand not wanting to delete a branch. > Especially since I think I am the one who Dmitry is referring to asking > for it. (Though I think what I wanted was releases which is subtly > different) that goes under "for historical reasons" :) > I think there are some hacks I could make in our trunk builder if I at > least have a ML post like this as justification. I am not 100% sure that > is possible though. No hacks needed and I've referenced this ML post: https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/pull/158 Please let me know if that's what you wanted, to avoid further confusion :) Cheers, Alan __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
