On 02/19/2016 01:29 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
By removing stable branches you mean stable branches for mitaka and
newer releases or that includes stable/liberty which already exist as
well?
I think the latter is more complicated, I don't think we should drop
stable/liberty like that because other people (apart from TripleO) may
also depend on that. I mean, it wouldn't be very "stable" if stable
branches were deleted before their supported phases.
Yeah, this is a valid concern. Maybe we should recommend RDO somehow
ignore stable/liberty, and then no longer have stable branches..
But that said, I'm +1 to not have stable branches for newer releases.
Cheers,
Lucas
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all!
Initially we didn't plan on having stable branches for IPA at all. Our gate
is using the prebuilt image generated from the master branch even on
Ironic/Inspector stable branches. The branch in question was added by
request of RDO folks, and today I got a request from trown to remove it:
<trown> dtantsur: btw, what do you think the chances are that IPA gets rid
of stable branch?
<dtantsur> I'm +1 on that, because currently only tripleo is using this
stable branch, our own gates are using tarball from master
<dtantsur> s/tarball/prebuilt image/
<trown> cool, from RDO perspective, I would prefer to have master package in
our liberty delorean server, but I cant do that (without major hacks) if
there is a stable/liberty branch
<trown> LIO support being the main reason
<trown> fwiw, I have tested master IPA on liberty and it works great
So I suggest we drop stable branches from IPA. This won't affect the Ironic
gate in any regard, as we don't use stable IPA there anyway, as I mentioned
before. As we do know already, we'll keep IPA compatible with all supported
Ironic and Inspector versions.
Opinions?
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
