On 25/01/16 18:19 +0100, Ghe Rivero wrote:
Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-25 16:06:36)On 20/01/16 13:23 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: >Thoughts? Feedback? Hey Folks, Thanks a lot for the feedback. Great comments and proposals in the many replies. I've gone through the whole thread and collected the most common feedback. Here's the summary: - The general idea of planning some sort of stabilization for a project is good but considering a cycle for it is terrible. It'd be easier if development cycles would be shorter but the 6-month based development cycles don't allow for planning this properly. - Therefore, milestones are more likely to be good for this but there has to be a good plan. What will happen with on-going features? How does a project decide what to merge or not? Is it really going to help with reviews/bugs backlog? or would this just increase the bakclog?There is still a option about having a sorter development cycle. As Thierry said in a previous message in this thread: "It is not entirely impossible that due to events organization we'll accidentally have a shorter cycle (say, 4 months instead of 6) in the future here and there. I could totally see projects take advantage of such a short cycle to place a "stabilization cycle" or another limited-feature-addition period." Would be nice to have more info about it. I guess if he mentioned it, it's because they foundation already faced that possibility.
Sure but I'd leave that for a separate thread. Flavio
Ghe Rivero- We shouldn't need any governance resolution/reference for this. Perhaps a chapter/section on the project team guide should do it. - As other changes in the commuity, it'd be awesome to get feedback from a project doing this before we start encouraging other projects to do the same. I'll work on adding something to the project team guide that covers the above points. did I miss something? Anything else that we should add and or consider? Cheers, Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
