> On 2016/01/12 7:14, Armando M. wrote:
>       On 11 January 2016 at 13:54, Hirofumi Ichihara
> <ichihara.hirof...@lab.ntt.co.jp <mailto:ichihara.hirof...@lab.ntt.co.jp> >
> wrote:
>               On 2016/01/12 5:14, Armando M. wrote:
>                       On 11 January 2016 at 12:04, Carl Baldwin <
> <mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net> c...@ecbaldwin.net
> <mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net> > wrote:
> 
> 
>                               What do we do?  My calendar was set up
> with the sane bi-weekly thing
>                               and it shows the meeting for tomorrow.  The
> last word from our
>                               fearless leader is that we'll have it today.  
> So,
> I'll be there today
>                               unless instructed otherwise.
> 
>                               The ics file now seems to reset the cadence
> beginning today at 2100
>                               and next Tuesday, the 19th, at 1400.  I guess
> we should either hold
>                               the meeting today and reset the cadence or
> fix the ics file.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                       This is what I would like to do now:
> 
>                       https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266019
> 
>                       I personally haven't seen that much of an attendance
> difference anyway, and at this point, it'll simplify our lives and avoid grief
> going forward.
> 
>               I like it.
> 
>               However, we have gathered from all over the world because
> neutron is big project. Should we have the choice so that more people get
> attendance opportunity?
> 
> 
>       This time, the return to the normal schedule was a disaster, plus
> every time we switch to daylight savings, or every time there's a holiday
> break/summit we have twice the chances to screw up if we keep the bi-
> weekly schedule.
> 
>       If I go and look at the logs [1] I don't have hard evidence that the bi-
> weekly schedule does indeed help the attendance of friendlier timezones,
> so I wonder...what's the point?
> 
> You're right. My reply was just general opinion. I think that most regular 
> folks
> probably attend both days now. I actually do as well.
> 
> I was worried that sometimes there are developers who introduce his bug or
> ask core to review although they usually don't attend. However, we have
> openstack-neutron channel for it.
> 
> 

In this case, we have Today's meeting, and from now on, just one weekly at 
Mondays 2100 UTC?

Dariusz (dasm) Smigiel

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to