On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 04:50 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > >> On 09/17/2015 08:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >>> >>>> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on >>>> the wiki[0]. >>>> >>>> There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this >>>> resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, >>>> MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security >>>> >>> >>> This is devil's advocate, but why does a project technically need a PTL? >>> Just so that there can be a contact point for cross-project things, >>> i.e. a lightning rod? There are projects that do a lot of group >>> leadership/delegation/etc, so it doesn't seem that a PTL is technically >>> required in all cases. >>> >> >> I think that is a great question for the TC to consider when they >> evaluate options for action with these projects. >> >> The election officials are fulfilling their obligation according to the >> resolution: >> >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.rst >> >> If you read the verb there the verb is "can" not "must", I choose the >> verb "can" on purpose for the resolution when I wrote it. The TC has the >> option to select an appointee. The TC can do other things as well, >> should the TC choose. >> > > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human judgement is > better than rules. > > For instance - one of the projects had a nominee but it missed the > deadline, so that's probably an easy on. > > For one of the projects it had been looking dead for a while, so this is > the final nail in the coffin from my POV > > For the other three - I know they're still active projects with people > interested in them, so sorting them out will be fun! > > This is the right approach. Human judgement #ftw! :) > > >> >>> >>>> There are 7 projects that will have an election: Cinder, Glance, Ironic, >>>> Keystone, Mistral, Neutron and Oslo. The details for those will be >>>> posted tomorrow after Tony and I setup the CIVS system. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Tristan >>>> >>>> >>>> [0]: >>>> >>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September_2015#Confirmed_Candidates >>>> >>>> [1]: >>>> >>>> http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
