On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security
This is devil's advocate, but why does a project technically need a PTL? Just so that there can be a contact point for cross-project things, i.e. a lightning rod? There are projects that do a lot of group leadership/delegation/etc, so it doesn't seem that a PTL is technically required in all cases.
There are 7 projects that will have an election: Cinder, Glance, Ironic, Keystone, Mistral, Neutron and Oslo. The details for those will be posted tomorrow after Tony and I setup the CIVS system. Thank you, Tristan [0]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September_2015#Confirmed_Candidates [1]: http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.html __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
