> > >>> I've repeatedly stated that the fact that we created an even smaller >>> clique of people to approve specs (nova-drivers which is a tiny subset >>> of the already faaaar too small nova-core) is madness, as it creates >>> an even worse review burden on them, and thus worsens the bottleneck >>> than we already have. >>> >> > I agree that the number of people who can approve specs is too small at > the moment. But relatively few people are actually reviewing specs so > building trust here is difficult.
I agree that the number of people who can approve specs is too small at the moment too. But I disagree that we have few people who actually reviews specs. For example I had a spec (approved for Juno and Kilo, but not approved for Liberty) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177112/ which has nine +1 and zero +2. I implemented this spec a long time ago but I spent about 2 months to reaprove spec in Liberty. And it's not reapproved yet. Especially strange for me is that not all nova cores have core status in nova-specs repository. Now we have 14 nova cores and only 7 nova-spec cores. I think if a contributor worked hard to become a nova core, he or she is competent to get a nova-spec core status.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
