On 04/29/2015 09:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-04-29 16:46:13 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> > [...] >>>> 1) Project governance has moved to a "big tent" model [1]. The vast >>>> majority of projects that used to be in Stackforge are being folded in >>> >> I think the phrase 'vast majority' is misleading, there are still a lot of >> projects on stackforge. > [...] > > Even the word "majority" is incorrect, at least for the moment. > Ignoring openstack-attic and stackforge-attic, of the 627 > non-retired git repositories hosted in our infrastructure, 55% are > stackforge and 45% are openstack.*. > > ssh -p 29418 review.openstack.org gerrit ls-projects \ > |cut -d/ -f1|sort|uniq -c > > The majority (by any sense of the word) are currently still squarely > stackforge. Once all the chef cookbooks and puppet modules switch > then the percentages there invert, but I have to agree with Joe that > it's by no means "vast" even then. If all the fuel repos also move > then that brings us to a 60/40 split in favor of openstack. Maybe > that starts to count as vast? > > Regardless, the stackforge/networking-.* repos only make up 3% of > the total count.
I apologize for the poor choice of words "vast majority". -- Russell Bryant __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
