On 23 April 2015 at 09:58, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/23/2015 12:14 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > > > On 23 April 2015 at 07:32, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com > > <mailto:rbry...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 04/22/2015 10:33 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > > > Would it make sense to capture these projects as simply > > > 'affiliated', ie. with a loose relationship to Neutron, > > because > > > they use/integrate with Neutron in some form or another > (e.g. > > > having 3rd-party, extending-api, > integrating-via-plugin-model, > > > etc)? Then we could simply consider extending the > > projects.yaml > > > to capture this new concept (for Neutron or any other > project) > > > once we defined its ontology. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > That seems interesting, but given the communities stated goals > > > around Big Tent, it seems to me like affiliation or not, adding > > > these under the Neutron tent, inside the larger OpenStack > Bigger > > > Tent, would be a good thing. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kyle > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for clearing some of the questions I raised. I should > > stress the > > > fact that I welcome the idea of finding a more sensible home for > these > > > projects in light of the big tent developments, but it seems like > > we're > > > still pouring down the foundations. I'd rather get us to a point > where > > > the landscape is clear, and the dust settled. That would help us > > make a > > > more informed decision compared to the one we can make right now. > > > > Can you be a bit more specific about what's not clear and would help > > make you feel more informed? > > > > > > I am not clear on how we make a decision, as to which project belongs or > > doesn't to the Neutron 'umbrella', 'tent', 'stadium' or however we end > > up calling it :) > > OK, that's fine. Figuring that out is the next step if folks agree with > Neutron as the home for networking-foo repos. I'm happy to write up a > strawman proposal for inclusion criteria and a set of expectations > around responsibilities and communication. > > What about the other Neutron related ones that didn't strictly follow the networking- prefix in the name, would the naming convention be one of the criteria? I look forward to your proposal. Thanks, Armando > -- > Russell Bryant > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
