Thanks for clarifying! Ryan
On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Mike Perez <thin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 00:24 Fri 27 Mar , Ryan Hsu wrote: >> Rightfully so, but it doesn't hurt to offer suggestions that might improve >> the community. It would just be nice to have exclusions reconsidered if there >> are legitimate bugs behind them. You see them all the time in the tempest >> tests ala "SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1373513 is resolved" so it's hard to >> understand why we can't just apply the same principles to third-party CI. > > Your usage of exclusions is fine for fixing bugs in my opinion. My meaning of > exclusion was not allowing these additional tests to be discovered. > > -- > Mike Perez > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
