On 00:24 Fri 27 Mar , Ryan Hsu wrote: > Rightfully so, but it doesn't hurt to offer suggestions that might improve > the community. It would just be nice to have exclusions reconsidered if there > are legitimate bugs behind them. You see them all the time in the tempest > tests ala "SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1373513 is resolved" so it's hard to > understand why we can't just apply the same principles to third-party CI.
Your usage of exclusions is fine for fixing bugs in my opinion. My meaning of exclusion was not allowing these additional tests to be discovered. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
