On 11/17/14, 10:00 AM, "Jason Rist" <jr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 11/17/2014 06:43 AM, Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis wrote: >> Le 17/11/2014 14:19, Matthias Runge a écrit : >> >>> There is already horizon on pypi[1] >>> >>> IMHO this will lead only to more confusion. >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>> [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/horizon/2012.2 >> >> Well the current "horizon" on Pypi is "The OpenStack Dashboard" + >> horizon(_lib) included >> >> If the future "horizon" on pypi is "openstack_dashboard" alone, it would >> still pull "horizon_lib" as a dependency, so it would not brake the >> existing. >> >> So indeed the "horizon" package itself in Pypi would not have >> horizon(_lib) in it anymore, but he "pip install horizon" would pull >> everything due to the dependency horizon will have with horizon_lib. >> >> I find this the least confusing issue and the "horizon" package on Pypi >> would still be seen as "The OpenStack Dashboard" like it is now. We >> would only add an "horizon_lib" package on Pypi. >> Therefore existing third-party "requirements.txt" would not brake >> because they would pull horizon_lib with horizon. and they would still >> import the proper module. Every backwards compatibility (requirements >> and module) is therefore preserved. >> >> > >+1 to this solution +1 from me as well.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
