On 14/11/14 15:46, Wood, Matthew David (HP Cloud - Horizon) wrote: > On 11/14/14, 4:24 AM, "Jaromir Coufal" <jcou...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> My opinion and preference: >> * horizon_lib (framework) + horizon (UI) > > I agree with both the concept behind these names and the name selections > given here. People don¹t think of Nova as the framework, nor Neutron as > the framework. That¹s the server/service that we make rest calls against. > I like: > > (horizon_lib or horizon_framework) and horizon
The concern with this raised by Matthias is that application developers who currently do "import horizon" to build plug-ins will be surprised and completely broken once they upgrade. Changing both names would alleviate that a little. Julie > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
