I think the point is that if there were discussions that lead to uncertainty about the split, they should have resulted in a - 1/-2 on the spec instead of letting it sit there. On Aug 29, 2014 9:46 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 12:25 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> On 28/08/14 17:02, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >>> I understand your frustration about the silence, but the silence from >>> core team members may actually be a loud statement about where their >>> priorities are. >>> >> >> I don't know enough about the Nova review situation to say if the >> process is broken or not. But I can say that if passive-aggressively >> ignoring people is considered a primary communication channel, something >> is definitely broken. >> > > Nobody is ignoring anyone. There have ongoing conversations about the > scheduler and Gantt, and those conversations haven't resulted in all the > decisions that Don would like. That is unfortunate, but it's not a sign of > a broken process. > > -jay > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
