+1 my sentiments exactly, and this will actually help folks contribute in a more meaningful and productive way. /Alan
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com] Sent: August-29-14 12:28 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken? On 08/28/2014 04:01 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh > <alan.kavan...@ericsson.com <mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to > clearly describe in the Wiki the process and workflow for the BP > approval process and build in this process how to deal with > discrepancies/disagreements and build timeframes for each stage and > process of appeal etc. > The current process would benefit from some fine tuning and helping > to build safe guards and time limits/deadlines so folks can expect > responses within a reasonable time and not be left waiting in the cold. > > > This is a resource problem, the nova team simply does not have enough > people doing enough reviews to make this possible. All the more reason to make it obvious which reviews are not being addressed in a timely fashion. (I'm thinking something akin to the order screen at a fast food restaurant that starts blinking in red and beeping if an order hasn't been filled in a certain amount of time.) Perhaps by making it clear that reviews are a bottleneck this will actually help to address the problem. Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
