I think we need some clarification here too about the difference between the general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation. From my understanding, the Neutron incubation isn't the path to a separate project and independence from Neutron. It's a process to get into Neutron. So if you want to keep it as a separate project with its own cores and a PTL, Neutron incubation would not be the way to go.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the info > on incubation: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects > > Susanne > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the >> Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the >> reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong in >> Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator. >> >> The Pros: >> * Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away along with the lbaas v2 >> code. We do not have to apply for incubation later on. >> * As incubation project we have our own core and should be able ot commit >> our code >> * We are starting out as an OpenStack incubated project >> >> The Cons: >> * Not sure of the velocity of the project >> * Incubation not well defined. >> >> If Octavia starts as a standalone stackforge project we are assuming that >> it would be looked favorable on when time is to move it into incubated >> status. >> >> Susanne >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Kevin Benton
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
