+1, I think in future we should invite the other project(i.e. Nova) core member to review the blueprint if it is related to that specific project.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi <m...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Yes, indeed. > I do not want to be over dramatic but the discussion on the original "Group > Based Policy and the way forward" thread is nothing short of heartbreaking. > After months and months of discussions, three presentations at the past > three summits, a design session at the last summit, and (most relevant to > this thread) the approval of the spec, why are we talking about the merits > of the work now? > > I understand if people think this is not a good idea or this is not a good > time. What I do not understand is why these concerns were not raised > clearly and openly earlier. > > Best, > > Mohammad > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Stefano Maffulli ---08/06/2014 04:47:21 > PM---On Wed 06 Aug 2014 01:21:26 PM PDT, Eugene Nikanorov wro]Stefano > Maffulli ---08/06/2014 04:47:21 PM---On Wed 06 Aug 2014 01:21:26 PM PDT, > Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > So I don't think it's fair to blame re > > From: Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 08/06/2014 04:47 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] How to improve the specs review process (was > Re: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward) > ------------------------------ > > > > On Wed 06 Aug 2014 01:21:26 PM PDT, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > > So I don't think it's fair to blame reviewers here. > > Just want to be super clear: there is no 'blaming' here. This is a > request to regroup and look at why we are having this conversation about > GBP now, this late in cycle, and about such fundamental topics (the > choice of 'endpoint' as name is only one of them), after in-person > conversations over more than one release cycle and summits. > > I am available for the meeting on Monday, Kyle. > > In order to prepare for the meeting we should agree on the scope of the > root cause analysis. I think the problem should be framed around the > message Mark McClain sent, especially the "Why this email" which I quote > below: > > > Our community has been discussing and working on Group Based Policy > > (GBP) for many months. I think the discussion has reached a point > > where we need to openly discuss a few issues before moving forward. > [...] > > I think the fact that this very fair question has been raised so late is > the problem we need to find the cause for. Would you agree? > > We'll use time during the meeting on Monday to use a simple technique to > investigate this deeply, no need to spend time now and via email. > > /stef > > -- > Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
