On 2014-07-14 17:05:32 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Indeed, I don't recall anyone telling Nova cores developers that > we should be manually "expiring" patches, so I've not tried to > expire any myself.
I think the point is not so much to "expire" patches since age/staleness is only a moderately useful proxy for identifying whether a change is still useful. Instead core reviewers can set a change to Workflow -1 (work in progress) if it looks like it needs more work to get back into a reasonable shape, or abandon it if it no longer fits the direction of the project at all. This is a human judgement call, and much more helpful than just culling changes based on age alone. -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
